Introduction:
The Child Restraint Marriage Act 1929, and the Islamabad Capital Child Marriage Restraint Act 2025. The Child Marriage Restraint Act, it was established to safeguard the rights of children getting married at a very young age which was a violation of the fundamental human rights of an individual.
Background and purpose:
During the British India times, in 1929 before Pakistan was created, at that time many underage child marriages before puberty which was fuelled by the people due to, poverty, lack of education and awareness. This resulted in health issues and social issues. It was introduced after social reforms and campaigns by Raja Ram Mohan and Mohammad Ali Jinnah. The legal issue at the time was that it violated the fundamental human rights of an individual such as right to education, health and protection, as children cannot give consent to marriage due to their immature age.
The 1929 act failed to achieve uniformity of age of both the genders, it did not make the marriage contract void, there was no effective enforcement of the act and the punishment and penalties for it were lenient. In the case of Mumtaz Bibi v. Qaism (Islamabad high court the act failed to make the marriage contract automatically invalid in view of this issue a need for a new act was after the 18th constitutional amendment all the provinces could make its own laws. The 1929 Act is still applicable in the provinces like Punjab, K.P.K, and Baluchistan with the amendments made by the provincial government. The Islamabad Capital Marriage Restraint Act 2025 was introduced was introduced for the Islamabad capital territory.
Key clauses and mechanisms:
Section 1: states that the act applies to Islamabad capital territory
Section2: defines the word child as a person (male or female) who are under the age of 18. It also defines child marriage as a process of marriage where one or both contracting parties are children.
Section 2a: states the child is a minor under the age of 18 for both genders.
Section 4-7; states the new stricter punishment such as 2-3 years of imprisonment with an including fine. The parents and guardians who contribute to the child marriages will also the same punishment. The Nikah registrar will face an imprisonment of 1 year.
The purpose of the sections is to safeguard children for early or forced marriage by legally raising the age to 18 for both sexes. Secondly, to remove gender discrimination in minimum marriage age. Thirdly, to spread a strong message against child marriage by penalising not just the direct parties but also the people who took part in it (parents and guardians). This law provided clarity and definitions, judicial processes and enforcement so the law is actionable.
Implementation and practical effect:
The law is being seen as a perfect tool for protecting children’s rights. Young children instead of getting married early can now pursue what they want and also their lives and liberty are protected at the same time. However, there is some opposition by the religious bodies that setting a particular age to get married is un-Islamic. But the Federal Shariat court in 2022 already decided that setting a minimum age does not go against the principles of Islam, because the integral fundamental of Islam is to protect and value mental and physical maturity as well. Also, the new act has stricter approach towards implementing the law and preventing child marriages as now the male will be imprisoned for 2-3 years with fine. The Nikah registrar will face an imprisonment of 1 year.
This law can be viewed as necessary to overcome this issue. The absence of it can lead to ruining the society’s social welfare, this law works for the betterment of the society and one should follow it as they are made with the intention to safeguard and protect the people. To reduce these issues, it is not only the job of the state by implementing it but also the duty of the public as a whole to be aware of the risks and issues so they can act upon it. By working together this issue can be reduced if not finished. To make sure that it is being implemented is the job of the government and they should show loyalty towards it, as there are many scenarios of bribery used to escape punishment. If these things are catered strictly then the implementation will be effective.
Conclusion:
In view of all what has been said and discussed above the developments in the law has made it accessible and reliable for the people. The changes in the act by the 2025 Act on the 1929 act shows that the loop holes are trying to be filled in which the previous laws had and now aims to develop it into one of the good laws which caters one of the biggest issue and debate in the society.